Litmos Pricing 2026

Three plans, in order, with the top one separated by artificial intelligence features rather than by capacity. That is the whole publicly knowable shape of Litmos commercials, and it is worth knowing before a call because it tells you what the upsell conversation will be about.

Plan names and the “Contact for Pricing” wording are Litmos’s own, from its plans page, retrieved 9 September 2026.

Note what the top-tier separator is. Litmos does not gate its top plan behind user volume or storage, it gates it behind AI Assistant, AI Content Authoring, AI Playlists and AI or ML video assessment and tagging. If your team authors little and consumes bought content, that gate sits on features you may never open. If your bottleneck is course production, it sits on the exact thing you would be buying the platform for. You cannot price that trade-off from public information, but you can decide which side of it you are on before Litmos frames it for you.

The one hard number on the grid is not a price at all: APIs at up to 100 requests per minute. It is on the feature comparison because ceilings like that get used as tier levers. No overage rate is published for breaching it.

This matters because of a pattern worth naming. When one real figure exists for one tier, it is tempting to scale it across the whole ladder and publish the resulting table. The table looks like research and reads like authority, and every row after the first is invented. Litmos does not even offer a first row, so a Litmos price table anywhere on the internet is manufactured from top to bottom.

Compare that with what a published price actually lets you do. On iSpring Learn or TalentLMS you can put your learner count against a published rate and have a budget line the same afternoon. With Litmos, the first real number arrives after a demo.

Opacity is not automatically a red flag, but it does move work onto you. Because Litmos publishes no unit, the first thing to settle is what you are being billed for: registered users or active users, monthly or annually, with or without a floor. A quote that arrives as a single annual number with no unit behind it is not comparable to anything, including next year’s renewal of itself.

Second, pin the plan. The feature grid puts the AI capability in the top plan, so confirm in writing which plan every feature in your requirement list actually belongs to. Third, ask for the term and the renewal uplift together, because an attractive first-year figure with an unbounded renewal is the most common shape of a bad LMS deal.

Then benchmark the whole programme rather than the licence. The platform fee is usually the smaller half of what training costs you, and our cost per employee trained calculator puts the licence next to the learner hours it consumes.